Who wants to be a referee?
A National Past-time
Just a few weeks in and the 2009 season of referee bashing is well and truly underway. This is arguably as big a national pursuit as the actual game itself and no code is spared.
The AFL have had their ‘rushed behind’ ruling in the spotlight recently. Leading umpire Brett Rosebury has been heavily criticised over an error made in the heat of battle in, of all things, a trial match.
Rugby League has now introduced two on-field referees to be backed up by the video referee but that hasn’t helped them avoid their own controversy, with a knock-on that led to a try being missed by all the officials.
In Super 14 rugby there has been an ‘uproar’ over the new merit-based system, which has seen neutrality removed from matches between the SANZAR provinces. There has also been continued confusion over the Experimental Law Variations and recently leading Australian referee Matt Goddard was stood down following criticism of his handling of the Hurricanes vs Bulls match. This despite being praised for his handling of earlier matches in the tournament.
When you’re the referee, everyone’s got an opinion
In most people’s day to day work their performance is assessed by their peers, their direct boss and the management of the company they work for. Anything further is usually limited to water-cooler discussions with colleagues.
But the performance of sport’s officials is under far more public scrutiny and the men and women in the middle often find themselves subject to judgment, not just from their employer but from all sides: the media, fans, sponsors, players and coaches are all more than happy to share their opinions and a leading official’s future can often be in the hands of a group of people with little or no accountability, and, I have to say, often little understanding of the laws too.
In the international spotlight
This has been seen over the years in Super 14 where patriotism has resulted in referees from opposition countries being hung out to dry. A well credentialed Australian referee has recently been asked not to return to South Africa and New Zealand based on a personal bias from rugby officialdom in those countries.
The spread of blogs has put further pressure on officials as their performances are now critiqued round the clock and for a global audience to see where slanderous comments by faceless individuals are often made. The public will not tolerate mistakes from match officials, despite the fact that they arguably make less errors than many of the ‘star’ players on the field.
So why do we put ourselves through it? It’s unlikely to be for financial reasons.
It’s a question we ask ourselves a bit. And the answer is because we love it.
-
-
Log in to rate.Comments: 5Views: 283
Comments
-
Andrew Lindsay, 3 years ago | FlagThe IRB were very proactive in initiating a review of the laws and proposing the ELV's. I have seen many games where they have worked beautifully and the game is certainly faster from a playing and refereeing perspective. However as tactics have developed over a couple of years, I think it is fair to say they have not been the success the Australian rugby public were hoping for. That said, we need to be careful about what Stephen Jones says as he has for a long time been very critical of anything Australian. His comments on the ELV’s removing the power of the scrum are nonsense.
I think where referees have got it wrong is their reluctance to be harsher at the breakdown and award a Penalty Kick rather than a Free Kick. The Free Kick was meant to be a tool to stop 50:50 decisions by referees costing teams games when the infringement was not clear and obvious. Instead we now have a situation where we see blatant infringements go punished by a Free Kick. The referee has the tools to turn these into Penalties but for some reason there has generally been a reluctance to do this.
It seems by July we will get some clarity from the IRB and at least then we can move forward.
-
Glen Ella, 3 years ago | FlagI am commenting
about the Stephen Jone's article in the Times re the ELV's. I must say that i agree with many of his comments. Whilst I agree that the IRB had to trial these new laws in the South, I feel that they have made our game much looser and unstructur ed. I agreee with his comments that there is too much aimless kicking with is bogging the game down. People say that the ball is in play for longer times, however I would rather it be shorter with more constructi
ve play than the dribble we are watching now. The game is about tactics and stratergy, like a game of chess. Mauls and breakdowns
are now a shambles so bring back to old laws, plus please bring back rucking. If done without mallice, it is an eccential part of our game. Currently players are falling over and killing tha ball, but if they were gently reminder with a few scrathes on their backs for the illegal act, i am sure they wouldn't do it too often, we have gone soft!!! -
Scott_Drummond, 3 years ago | FlagAgree a bit with Glen's comments about the ELVs - you guys should check out this really interestin
g article about the ELVs from the Times Online: http://www
.timesonli ne.co.uk/t ol/sport/c olumnists/ stephen_jo nes/articl e5992866.e ce It's written by reknowned rugby journo Stephen Jones and brings up some very interestin
g points indeed. -
Glen Ella, 3 years ago | Flagi have some symphathy for referee's of recent times because of the cconstant changes to our laws. As well as the introducti
on of the ELV's have contribute d as it takes up to 6 months before players and coaches get any consistanc y with the man in the middle, as all ref's are have different interputat ions. I feel that most ref's are being judged too harshly as they are refereeing
to the laws at not to the spirit of the game, in other words let the game flow. I beleive that the merit system was destined to fail. As soon as there was going to be any controvers
y about ref's it was going to blow up. I think the old system was better, when neutral ref's were appointed. Why did we meddle with this? I think that the standard of rugby this year is poor so people are pointing their finger at ref's, you are only human!!
-
Scott_Drummond, 3 years ago | FlagI love the title of this post Andrew - makes me think about a reality TV show where we get all the aspiring young referees and umpires out there to undertake weekly challenges
with a panel of judges and the public voting to see who stays in the competitio n. Who would you have as the three expert judges?
Category: blogs » news posts
Inappropriate Flag
Flagging notifies the Sports Hydrant webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!
If you believe this content violates the Terms of Service, please write a short description why. Thank you.
Inappropriate Comment Flag
Flagging notifies the Sports Hydrant webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!
Email Friends
Your First Name (optional)
Email Addresses (comma separated)
Import friends
Message to Friends (optional)
Are you human?
Or, you can forward this blog with your own email application.